this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
241 points (95.5% liked)

Greentext

4464 readers
1364 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Not a true greentext but I hope I have captured the spirit of it. (First time I wrote smth like this, don't be harsh on me. >w<)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Yes, and the master should be a paraphrase not a password.

[–] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 5 months ago (4 children)

That's just recommended to emphasize length. If your password is as long as a passphrase it's likely more secure (harder to remember though).

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (3 children)

But if the point is to remember it, then you should use the security from length of series of 5+ random words. It’s easier to remember, write down, and type. All great characteristics of a master passphrase.

[–] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I don't disagree, sorry if it sounded like I did.

There's just a theoretical weakness since the base word lists are usually public knowledge and bruteforcers could (and probably already have) optimize for that.

The advantages of a passphrase outweigh though as you mentioned. An attacker would first need your repo anyway.

[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm adding obscure memes and anime references to my passphrases. Good luck bruteforcing that

[–] vorpuni@jlai.lu 1 points 5 months ago

Separating some of the words with random symbols also isn't too hard to remember and no chance that can be bruteforced.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)