this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2024
133 points (96.5% liked)
Games
16800 readers
789 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Not my work, AI generated but I feel it did a good job.
[Logic]: Ah, the developers of "Disco Elysium" have been dismissed. Let us analyze this from a rational perspective. The game, a masterpiece in narrative and character development, owes its acclaim to these very minds. Their termination disrupts the continuity of such high-quality work. This is problematic.
[Inland Empire]: A tragedy unfolds. Imagine the despair in their hearts, the unfulfilled dreams floating like phantoms in the ether. The streets of Revachol mourn the loss of their creators. The art, the soul of the game—will it ever be the same?
[Empathy]: Feel their pain. Their passion was more than just code and art; it was a piece of their soul. The characters, the stories, the intricate world-building—they poured themselves into this. We must acknowledge their anguish and offer solidarity.
[Authority]: This is an affront to the very order of creativity. The dismissal of such talent must be questioned. Who is responsible? And what are their motives? A power play, perhaps. We must stand firm against such injustices.
[Shivers]: Listen. The winds carry whispers of discontent. The city itself is restless, the neon lights flicker with uncertainty. This isn't just a corporate decision; it's a shift in the cosmic balance. The fabric of what we know is fraying.
[Drama]: A scandal! An outrage! The headlines will scream of this betrayal. How will the fans react? The drama will unfold on forums and social media, a spectacle of public opinion and outcry.
[Electrochemistry]: Ah, the rush. The thrill of rebellion, of standing up against the system. There’s a high in fighting for what's right. Let’s ride this wave of adrenaline and take action.
[Pain Threshold]: The sting of this news is sharp, but we endure. We understand suffering—it’s a part of existence. This too shall pass, but not without leaving a scar.
[Suggestion]: Reach out, express our support. A letter, a message, a tweet—something to show solidarity. It could make a difference, a small ripple in the ocean of their despair.
[Half Light]: Prepare for battle. This is a call to arms. Rally the community, gather allies. This is not a time for passivity. We must be ready to fight for what is just and right.
[Conceptualization]: Visualize the future. What can be salvaged? How can we assist? The creative process is resilient. New ideas will emerge, and with support, these developers will rise again.
[Endurance]: We move forward, despite the pain. This setback is not the end. We press on, stronger, more determined. Together, we can create something even greater.
[Volition]: Stay true to our convictions. Support the dismissed developers, uphold the values that "Disco Elysium" represents. In unity, we find strength. This is our mission now.
Can you not?
What, you expect me to come up with something creative, original and interesting on my own? I'll never become a games company CEO that way!
Please stop replying if you don't have anything to contribute.
Thank you for your contribution to the discussion