this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2023
943 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59963 readers
3257 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] siririus@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (9 children)

Nuclear has been at that supply level since the 1970s. Other parts of the world have much higher renewable mixes in their energy inputs. For example, Germany:

https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/germany-likely-pass-50-mark-renewable-power-this-year-minister-2023-09-18/

Nuclear is not necessary to meet climate change targets. In fact, it's so damned expensive to deploy and maintain, it will harm meeting those targets.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (8 children)

https://www.destatis.de/EN/Press/2023/03/PE23_090_43312.html

And because they shut down their nuclear plants, they had to start burning coal again, which is about as bad an energy source you can get when it comes to emissions and pollution. Their coal use % went up from 2021 to 2022. They may have a higher renewable mix, but they've also increased their emissions. Not to mention, they also significantly reduced their energy imports from France -- the majority of which is generated by nuclear energy. They are replacing clean energy with coal.

France is actually a significant counterpoint as well. They've got 65%+ nuclear energy, and renewables just add to the percent of clean energy sources. Considering they're doing much better than Germany in terms of not using fossil fuels, I believe they are an example to follow over Germany -- which means nuclear is critical to meet our climate goals.

[–] siririus@lemmy.world -3 points 11 months ago (5 children)

And because they shut down their nuclear plants, they had to start burning coal again...

Unrelated and a whataboutism.

[–] Overshoot2648@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It was completely relevant to the discussion. That's not a whataboutism.

[–] siririus@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

He changed the topic from nuclear to coal.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)