this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
265 points (98.5% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54669 readers
417 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gsus4@programming.dev 102 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (14 children)

Maybe those services could take a hint and create a unified platform where each partner gets a cut depending on % of their content watched.

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 40 points 5 months ago (10 children)
[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 24 points 5 months ago (4 children)

There's a very functional middle ground between all in one cable, and a hundred different services.

[–] AAA@feddit.de 1 points 5 months ago

No there isn't. Companies are incentivised to extract as much money as possible from any given buyer. There is never a "this is enough money, I won't charge you more" situation. Inevitably every buyer will become a non-buyer, because they were outpriced.

Competition should solve this issue, but it doesn't work in media because there's no two rights holders for star wars content, or marvel content, or whatever. So services cannot compete on the same content, because the rights holders simply won't let them.

Copyright is a pest.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)