this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
156 points (99.4% liked)

Games

16806 readers
1127 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 77 points 5 months ago (21 children)

Like, how do you even screw this up? Sony...the ones who have access to all the super secret technical documents, full source codes, CAD drawings, prototypes, probably even people still working there who worked on it originally etc. Things that many who work on the open source emulators can only dream of seeing.

Made a shit emulator.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 17 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

They don't want it to succeed.

[–] MrSoup@lemmy.zip 7 points 5 months ago (3 children)
[–] turtlepower@lemm.ee 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Because there's more money to be made by releasing HD remakes that they charge you out the nose for.

[–] Titou@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago

This remind me of Gta San Andreas remaster somewhat

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)