this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
23 points (82.9% liked)

Games

16785 readers
761 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
23
Microsoft president Brad Smith admits UK regulator was "tough and fair" on Activision Blizzard deal (www.eurogamer.net)
submitted 10 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 11 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Isnt that the body that let the deal happen? Because.... Yeah, of course he wants to tongue their assholes while US regulators threaten to claw the deal back.

[–] Poopfeast420@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They blocked the deal at first, because of concerns with Cloud gaming. Microsoft made concessions and made a deal with Ubisoft, and it got approved.

[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But the praise comes after US regulators tried to appeal the green light to undo the merger. I think this is actually shade at the US for challenging the decision

[–] Poopfeast420@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The praise comes after he gets asked about the UK regulators on a UK show. Like I said, the CMA initially also tried to block it, just like the FTC, so it wouldn't make sense to me to single one of them out.

[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 10 months ago

You single one out because they started to push back and then relented, and you want the other one to also relent while they are currently pushing back. And by calling the first one fair, you make it so the second one can also look fair in the court of public opinion if they back down.

The platform doesnt mean a whole lot, since these conversations are pre screened pretty often. Its hard to know if they had been given prep time or not, and that means we cant know to what degree this PR statement is pre planned.

load more comments (2 replies)