this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
657 points (69.5% liked)

Memes

45746 readers
1592 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub 41 points 5 months ago (43 children)

Given that solar and wind are cheaper, get built to schedule and far less likely to have cost overruns, this meme is bullshit.

Sure, nukes are great. But we need clean energy right the fuck now. Spending money on new nukes is inefficient when it could be spent on solar and wind.

[–] Krono@lemmy.today 2 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Are solar and wind really "clean" energy? Everyone in this thread seems to ignore the costs of these methods.

Every modern wind turbine requires 60 gallons of highly synthetic oil to function, and it needs to be changed every 6 months. That's a lot of fossil fuel use.

Lithium mining for batteries is extremely destructive to the environment.

Production of solar panels burns lots of fuel and produces many heavy metals. Just like with nuclear waste, improper disposal of these toxic elements can be devastating to the environment.

Of course, solar and wind are a big improvement over coal and natural gas. I dont want the perfect to be the enemy of the good, I just want to be realistic about the downfalls of these methods.

I believe, with our current technology, that nuclear is our cleanest and greenest option.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If you're going to do that, then also consider the co2 output of all the concrete needed for nuclear power plants.

[–] Mrs_deWinter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

And the environmental impact of mining and enriching the fuel.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (40 replies)