this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
67 points (93.5% liked)

Technology

59605 readers
3501 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Such a waste.. all that heat could be used for something.

[–] bamboo@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

How’s a data center going to use a lot of hot air? Maybe they could use specialized heat pumps to condense it even more and spin some turbines, but the efficiency would be extremely low and probably not worth the investment. Best option is probably to just heat a few adjacent buildings in the winter.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

No I mean if stuff like this was built in better locations the waste heat could be used by .. another company or to warm homes..

[–] bamboo@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I understand what you’re saying, I just don’t think it’s easy to deliver such low density heat in a useful way. Large datacenters are located away from residential land because they can be unpleasant to live near, and while businesses could be close by, what industries can utilize a huge volume of ~100 degree air?

[–] Hardeehar@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Heat is heat, "low density large volume" or whatever, they've successfully used it in cold climate locations to heat residential homes already.