this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
535 points (93.8% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3183 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I feel like the internet is such a lost cause at this point that it would be better to invest in other efforts like the Gemini protocol.

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 7 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Gemini protocol

IDK, but I don't think that the problem is that any particular application protocol is bad so much as it is capitalists going to capitalist, and they've shit all over everything in the Quest to Make a Buck.

It's not like a new protocol, if it becomes as widely adopted, won't see the same vultures swoop in and strip mine any value they can find there, too.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

A more lightweight protocol limits the attack surface for capitalism. The web sucks because basically anything can be wrapped in http, including ads, tracking cookies, data collection JavaScript, etc.

Gemini protocol only carries markdown

[–] rainynight65@feddit.de 1 points 4 months ago

How would you drive the adoption of such a protocol in an environment that is largely hostile towards attempts at demonetising things?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)