this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
510 points (98.1% liked)

Memes

45868 readers
1275 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Andrew15_5@mander.xyz 11 points 5 months ago (9 children)
[–] Lightfire228@pawb.social 45 points 5 months ago (8 children)

NSFL (Not Safe For Life) typically means stuff like gruesome injuries, blood and gore, or possibly fatalities

Which is different from NSFW, because sometimes you want to hear a dirty joke, bit you could do without seeing the aftermath of a Meat Crayon

[–] Andrew15_5@mander.xyz 14 points 5 months ago (6 children)

So the issue is that there is only NSFW label and no NSFL label?

[–] Lightfire228@pawb.social 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Andrew15_5@mander.xyz 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

OK, now I know. But I mean, it's just not there yet: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/317. Everyone would have to wait for it.

[–] Zoot@reddthat.com 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Tags/Flair isn't Nsfw/Nsfl. Tags could be tedious yes, but a seperate checkmark or a seperate toggle for simply NSFL should have been made from the get go.

[–] Andrew15_5@mander.xyz 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Well, that can't be changed now. People discuss NSFL in there, but I don't know what will be the rustler of it. Maybe it will be NSFW + NSFL tag. You can always create a new issue demanding NSFL to be treated as a special tag.

[–] Zoot@reddthat.com 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Its not a tag. It's an option. You can even filter out all nsfw posts already.

[–] Andrew15_5@mander.xyz 1 points 5 months ago

That's my point. It still feels like a tag anyway, but a very special one. Option feels not very specific, so I used "special tag".

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)