Fediverse

28499 readers

312 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Posts must be on topic.
Be respectful of others.
Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

ruud@lemmy.world

Xylinna@lemmy.world

MrCenny@lemmy.world

TragicNotCute@lemmy.world

automodbeta@lemmy.world

woelkchen@lemmy.world

The free fediverses should focus on consent (including consent-based federation), privacy, and safety (privacy.thenexus.today)

submitted 10 months ago by thenexusofprivacy@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/fediverse@lemmy.world

50 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] blue_berry@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Free fediverse(s) makes sense, building on top of that already floating term sounds sensible

[–] thenexusofprivacy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

How about this as a revised first sentence to clarify the focus is on an alternative (not the whole fediverse)?

As I discuss in the first post in the series, the "free fediverses" are regions of the fediverse that reject Meta and surveillance capitalism, and these strategies position the free fediverses as an alternative to Threads and "Meta's fediverses".

[–] blue_berry@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sounds fine at first glance

[–] thenexusofprivacy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 months ago

Thanks! I included a slightly-modified version of it in https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/7194307 , we'll see how it goes.