this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
405 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
2962 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] godfilma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

Tapes

Raw data

How, without the right kind of reader

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I never specified correctly read data.

I don't care weather they read it by microwave the tape and provide me a transcript of chef and dinner quest first reactions to it. Or if that ends up actually useful. But its interesting to know wether or not specific data is at all requestable.

When it comes to things that are deemed public, all the information around it should be too, regardless of intend or use.

In essence, everything is information, it would be a mistake to discriminate on perceived value because we never know what future science can accomplish or what specific aspiration someone may follow.

Practical Example: While its reasonable that most people assume The text of the Declaration of Independence is what is important. That is not the case if you happen to do a historical study of hemp genetics and want to learn what strain of the plant was used for the declaration.

An officia office should to my opinion put as much effort into being helpful against requests of both kind.

[–] CapeWearingAeroplane@sopuli.xyz 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The way I understand this, the issue is that without reading it they cannot verify that it doesn't contain sensitive information, so they can't give it out. That sounds like a reasonable explanation to me.

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 1 points 4 months ago

The president can't lie to us if he doesn't know who he is

load more comments (2 replies)