Because regardless of what species does it, cannibalism inevitably causes problems due to prions, diseases, and such. Even if the most dangerous parts (Central nervous system) are avoided, there are still problems (just more slowly).

[–] threeduck@aussie.zone 4 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Well, it doesn't cause prion diseases, it just spreads them. It's only transmissible by consumption of conspecifics (or often, as in mad cow disease, by eating similar species - when farmers were feeding cows dead chickens and cows).

So you're saying the only thing stopping you from eating factory farmed human meat is the risk to your own safety?

[–] Jolteon@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

No, I'm saying that's the main differentiation between cannibalism and normal meat eating.

Personally, I have a huge problem with all factory farmed meat, and am mostly vegetarian.

[–] threeduck@aussie.zone 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So... If there were no risk of disease, you would consider cannibalism and "normal meat eating" to be basically equitable, and equally justifiable? If not, why not?

Sorry I'm just having a hard time getting some solid admissions here, nobody wants to just straight up answer.

[–] Jolteon@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 months ago

As a human, yes I consider a human life to be more valuable than the life of a member of another species. Is that biased? Probably, but if that biased didn't exist, neither would humans.