this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
14 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

40329 readers
368 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
14
NAS OS with a web UI (sopuli.xyz)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by maniel@sopuli.xyz to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hello

I'm looking for a NAS OS, the hardware is 2bay Intel n100 machine (AOOSTAR R1), I want to run a RAID1 with few containers (syncthing, immich, jellyfin etc.) all of it to be configurable by web interface, tried some systems in a VM (hardware didn't arrive yet), casaos has nice 'app store', it's a nice docker wrapper, but it doesn't let me manage any kind of RAID (md, brfs, etc), openmediavault is ok for raid, but the containers aren't one click wonder like in other NAS OSes, TrueNAS SCALE seems to be an obvious choice, zfs is cool and everything but it uses kubernetes and it failed to deploy immich for example (100% CPU), i know its called SCALE but kube is a bit too complicated to me (IMO I'm 100% competent but i don't want to tinker), and there's... xpenology, this thing let's me install Synology's DSM and it's a breeze, it deployed immich right away though i had to do it with docker-compose.yml, but in web UI. Also let's say im in favor of xpenology... should i go bare metal or use it inside of proxmox? any pros and cons of both solutions?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 6 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Next truenas version replaces kubernetes with docker compose - you could try a nightly to see if that works for you

[–] golli@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

openmediavault is ok for raid, but the containers aren't one click wonder like in other NAS OSes

Since OMV also uses docker compose with a build in GUI to manage them, I don't assume this would be what OP is looking for either? Unless trueNAS also comes with some repository of preconfigured compose files.

[–] maniel@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

TrueNAS has some built-in kinda appstore, OMV on the other hand docker compose isn't that straightforward, first you need to add some unofficial repo, then install docker compose, then configure it

[–] golli@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

Right, totally forgot about that step.