this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
209 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

59680 readers
3218 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago (12 children)

It's obviously a great achievement though it would be nice to see improvements larger than 1-2%.

Let's hope the next one will be like a 10-12% improvement... though that's probably wishful thinking.

Storage is likely the bigger issue now.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 27 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'm more concerned with longevity and use of more environmentally friendly materials with solar panels than efficiency. In about 30 years or so, they reach their end of life so there will be hazardous waste resulting from that.

[–] Mountain_Mike_420@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Remember that solar just doesn’t stop working at some random day. The efficiency drops to where it makes sense to replace then people like me come in and buy the panels for pennies on the dollar because a 18% efficient panel will work just fine.

[–] Morphit@feddit.uk -3 points 3 months ago

Will you be able to handle all these panels as it becomes economically reasonable for people to replace them?

[–] BlackLaZoR@kbin.run 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

hazardous waste

What's hazardous in the solar panels?

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] BlackLaZoR@kbin.run 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Some solar panels are considered hazardous waste, and some are not

That's horribly unspecific

Lead and cadmium

AFAIK in EU Leaded solder is forbidden since many years (outside of safety related equipment). Cadmium is regulated in similar fashion. Electronic equipment disposal and recycling is also strictly controlled.

The whole thing looks like fear mongering.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Every few decades we would dump fields and fields of solar panels. I'm sure that's not good for the environment. The heavy metals, batteries, manufacturing and transportation byproducts, even the plastics that could be used in packaging. Wish there was a better renewable energy solution with no waste.

[–] BlackLaZoR@kbin.run 2 points 3 months ago

Nobody talks about dumping these things in the field. Glass, silicon, and aluminum can be reused or disposed safely. As I said in previous post - in EU electronic waste is disposed properly without dumping whole things into a landfill. Solar panels aren't even the hardest e-waste to deal with.

load more comments (9 replies)