this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
197 points (99.0% liked)

Games

16830 readers
431 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world 49 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Let them try to make games with only AI and see how they sell. This strike is to force producers to go "all or nothing" with AI, and choosing "all" is a terrible idea

[–] overload@sopuli.xyz 17 points 3 months ago (5 children)

AI being heavily implemented in voice acting is gonna suck so bad. Maybe in a few years it will be there but we're too early for full scale voice talent being replaced. Wish these people all the best with the strike.

[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Replacing people with AI creates a situation where the incentive for people to make original works is greatly diminished, so the ability of the AI to continue to improve is stunted by a lack of new training data. It's what we're already seeing with text-based language models and what we're starting to see with diffusion-based image models.

AI in art is inherently limited unless used only as a fine tuner on human made works. The fact that a work of art was made by humans is what makes it special in the first place.

[–] overload@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 months ago

Hard agree. There's still a threat of the generalised nature of AI meaning it won't just be a tool for people to use, but a complete replacement of large swathes of knowledge based work that can be automated.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)