this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
95 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

59569 readers
4136 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

My investigation reveals that the AI images we see on Facebook are an evolution of a Facebook spam economy that has existed for years, driven by social media influencers, guides, services, and businesses in places like India, Pakistan, Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam, where the payouts generated by this content, which seems marginal by U.S. standards, goes further. The spam comes from a mix of people manually creating images on their phones using off-the-shelf tools like Microsoft’s AI Image Creator to larger operations that use automated software to spam the platform. I also know that their methods work because I used them to flood Facebook with AI slop myself as a test.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 19 points 3 months ago (9 children)

These payouts are marginal‽

They are getting so many likes,” he says. “They got 700 likes within 2-4 hours. They must have earned $100 from just this one photo. Facebook now pays you $100 for 1,000 likes

I’d take fucking $25-$50 an hour for a few minutes of work.

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 32 points 3 months ago (8 children)

Facebook now pays you $100 for 1,000 likes

That can't be true, that's unreasonably high

[–] gumnut@aussie.zone 3 points 3 months ago

It says in the article that this is likely an exaggeration.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)