this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
274 points (88.3% liked)

Memes

45727 readers
859 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kjo@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 months ago (18 children)

What does "material analysis" means in this context? What should I search to know more? I searched the term and only came up with chemistry topics.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (14 children)

My original comment is meant to refer to the concept of Materialism, which contains the concepts of Marxist Dialectical and Historical Materialism. Materialism is a "reality-focused" branch of philosophy and analysis, contrasted with Idealism, which is idea-focused.

The connection to liberalism and fascism is because Liberalism is Idealist as opposed to Materialist. The Liberal answer to "where does fascism come from?" Would be "demagogues like Trump rising to power, racism, xenophobia, etc," yet when you ask why those ideas are present or not present, the Liberal cannot answer genuinely.

For Marxists, fascism is a consequence of Capitalism's decline, resulting in the Petty Bourgeois elements of society, ie the "Middle Class," sliding into worse conditions and allying with the Bourgeoisie against the Proletariat. In the Weimar Republic, Capitalism was declining and genuine Communism was gaining steam, with the KPD at the forefront and the SPD representing the moderate Socialists, so fascism gained power as a reaction. Communism and Socialism gained appeal among the Lower Classes while fascism gained power among the Liberals, ie the Middle and Upper Classes.

The other works listed by other commenters are great, but my personal favorite work on the subject is Elementary Principles of Philosophy.

[–] GiveMemes@jlai.lu -4 points 2 months ago (9 children)

You're very good at strawmanning arguments. I think most libs would just say that racism and xenophobia are inherent to tribalism, which is inherent to the human mind as an evolutionary trait. It can and should be overcome, but that doesn't change its innateness in our psyche.

[–] Sagittarii@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

"Human nature" is formed by societal norms, which are in turn formed by the present mode of production and thus material reality. Humans aren't racist by nature lmfao, such a dumb right wing assertion.

[–] GiveMemes@jlai.lu 0 points 2 months ago

I never said anything about human nature. If you're interested in reading more I replied to another comment on this thread.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)