this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
612 points (95.3% liked)

Greentext

4470 readers
1260 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hector@sh.itjust.works 40 points 2 months ago (22 children)

Honestly, as a DM, when this doesn’t infringe on other player’s fun like here I don’t mind doing extraordinary stuff for the Nat 20

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (19 children)

Taking away someone's intentional, roleplayed disability definitely falls under "infringing on someone's fun", though. If the player (not just the character) is also disabled and trying to represent themselves in the game, this goes beyond infringing on fun straight into lowkey offensive. I would never let this nat 20 work. Maybe it fixes the wheelchair or something.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 months ago (16 children)

Main issue is the wheelchair itself. No adventurer would ever use a wheelchair, the only reason we can use wheelchairs now are uniform roads and ada mandated ramps. Magic carpets exist and are cheap in game and don’t make you a liability.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How do you know he doesn't put it on a floating disk?

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Then it is no longer a wheelchair, it’s a magical floating chair which is acceptable.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 0 points 2 months ago

The wheels don't just vanish lol

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)