this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
436 points (97.6% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54716 readers
229 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

You wouldn't pirate a medicine, would you?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 44 points 2 months ago (38 children)

I’m a process chemist. I do this sort of thing for a living.

These guys don’t even know why what they’re suggesting is so dangerous. Do not do any of this.

[–] EchoCranium@lemmy.zip 67 points 2 months ago (19 children)

I'm a quality chemist. I test the API's that process chemists make to be sure they're right. Yeah, reactions don't always proceed as intended. These guys do understand the risks, and are only trying to provide an option. Here in the US the insurance companies are perfectly willing to let us die because funding expensive treatment hurts their bottom line. Unless you're independently wealthy, a small scale reactor at home may become the only option a person has available. Definitely risky, but why not take the chance when corporate America has determined you're not valuable enough to save?

[–] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I’m not disputing the reasoning behind why this is important. But “it is important” does not imply that their solution is the right one.

[–] EchoCranium@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There really should be better options, but it's where this country is currently at, where some home chemistry is something people would have to consider. You're right, it's dangerous and certainly has a lot of risks. With some background in it myself and access to resources that the general public doesn't have, I would still be hesitant to try something I'd cooked up in the basement at home. But, I'm also not at the point where I'm going to die from a treatable but unaffordable disease.

[–] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

There is exactly one easiest option: be like the rest of the civilized world and ban consumer marketing of medicine. HUGE amounts of the prices of drugs are just down to TV ads. “Ask your doctor about…” is horse shit, let your doctor decide what prescription drugs you need. And fire the cocaine-riddled, law-breaking marketing departments that soak up so much money.

[–] veniasilente@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But the right solution is inconstitutional and anti-corporate! Even socialist and maybe even "woke"! So, this is the option TPTB are leaving us with.

Don't like it? The second most useful thing to do compared to this is to ready your guillotine. That is the language they understand.

[–] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

No, just follow the money. It’s all going into marketing. Ban marketing (like the rest of the world!) and prices drop overnight.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 4 points 2 months ago

The "right one" would be open access by governments. But that's socialism, and bad for reasons ($$$$).

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (33 replies)