this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
617 points (93.9% liked)

Technology

59772 readers
3191 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (9 children)

Fire is a weapon of war. There is nothing immoral about employing it as such.

[–] Aradina@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 months ago (8 children)

"Mustard gas is a weapon of war. There is nothing immoral about employing it as such."

I honestly hope you never have to experience war.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Mustard gas is ineffective. That is the actual reason it's outlawed: The opposing force dons gas masks, completely negating the effect, the only stuff that it still kills is collateral damage. That's precisely what happened during WWI: It made everything nastier without actually having an impact on the strategic level.

There's this notion among many people that the Geneva convention is about preventing cruelty or something, not at all: It's about preventing pointless cruelty. Cruelty that does not actually serve a military objective. War is hell, that's already a given.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 1 points 2 months ago

They gave up pointless cruelty precisely because doing so cost them nothing.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)