this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
301 points (99.7% liked)

Linux

48352 readers
446 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

From: Alejandro Colomar <alx-AT-kernel.org>

Hi all,

As you know, I've been maintaining the Linux man-pages project for the last 4 years as a voluntary. I've been doing it in my free time, and no company has sponsored that work at all. At the moment, I cannot sustain this work economically any more, and will temporarily and indefinitely stop working on this project. If any company has interests in the future of the project, I'd welcome an offer to sponsor my work here; if so, please let me know.

Have a lovely day! Alex

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GammaGames@beehaw.org 5 points 2 months ago (9 children)
[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 17 points 2 months ago (8 children)

Bruce Perens is currently working on a new licensing model called Post Open requiring that business with sufficient revenue to pay up.

https://postopen.org/

[–] matcha_addict@lemy.lol 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why only "with sufficient revenue"? All commercial use should pay. Adding "with sufficient revenue" only makes it more difficult to enforce and introduces loopholes.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago

I've looked into this very briefly before and I think part of the reason is that tons of things we wouldn't necessarily call commercial usage are considered commercial usage. This was in relation to favoring the non non-commercial usage Creative Commons licenses though. (The ones they call free culture licenses.)

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)