this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
69 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

59963 readers
3481 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lnxtx@feddit.nl 15 points 3 months ago (8 children)

Any idea how they achieved it?

Ultra directional antennas with maximum allowable power?
Which frequency? 5-6 Ghz?

I can't find it in the datasheet.
But it says power consumption of 36 W (very high for just L2 Ethernet bridge).

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Maybe ultra low frequency somehow.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago

Now, it's six gigahertz according to the article. But by putting the routers close to each other, it doesn't matter so much.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 months ago

It's impossible to get gigabit speeds on ULF. The datasheet says it uses 5.925 GHz to 7.125 GHz.

[–] lnxtx@feddit.nl 2 points 3 months ago

Low frequency = lower bandwidth. But I had similar thoughts.

load more comments (4 replies)