this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
62 points (98.4% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54698 readers
542 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/0…

Seems like someone needs to pirate their content back.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 43 points 2 months ago (5 children)

The music can be copied to new hard drives without any loss in quality, so why are they leaving their only copy on 30 year old hard drives?

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 38 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Just following longstanding studio practice of putting the masters in a vault so you can forget about them.

They’re not used to the risks of bit rot.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A studio should be able to afford a good LTO tape drive for at least one backup copy; LTO tapes last over 30 years and suffer less from random bitrot than spinning disks. Just pay someone to spend a month duplicating the entire archive every couple of decades. And every decade you can also consolidate a bunch of tapes since the capacity has kept increasing; 18TB tapes are now available: $/MB it's always far cheaper to use tape.

They could have done that with the drives, but today you'd have to go find an ATA IDE or old SCSI card (of you're lucky) that'll work on a modern motherboard.

But I'd guess their problem is more not having a process for maintaining the archives than the technology. Duplicating and consolidating hard drives once a year would have been relatively cheap, and as long as they verified checksums and kept duplicates, HDs would have been fine too.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Easy work for a digital archivist.

Music studios didn’t have those in the 1990’s.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 2 points 2 months ago

I agree; it probably didn't occur to them. But it was a fairly common job in IT in the 90's. Not a career or job description, maybe, but a duty you got saddled with.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)