this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
47 points (98.0% liked)

Games

16806 readers
894 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (8 children)

People who like Civ usually don't like it when y'all make changes, so it's kinda surprising that Civ changes so much.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

If you like a particular Iteration there is little to stop you from playing it.

Every version is an unique interpretation of the core premise.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

That is true, but sometimes technology advances and it gets difficult to get the older titles to play nice with newer hardware. That doesn't mean the gameplay needs to be completely changed up in the next iteration.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago

Sounds like a you Problem. Just because you cant get it to run doesnt mean we shouldn't have a New Civ.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)