this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
854 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

59495 readers
3050 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 months ago (5 children)

when he said that software should be free as in freedom, because that would solve this problem

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

While I don't disagree with Stallman, how would that solve this problem? This is about a major video hosting platform having market shares and injecting ads into their streams / UI. I do not see - even if every line of youtube's software sources were public - how that would solve the issue that the hosting platform can insert ads anywhere - honestly, as much as I hate ads, I can't even blame youtube for doing something morally questionable - they are providing a service, they are not a public institution obligated to making information accessible.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

that's right: into their UI; with free software, you could use a different UI with no ads

[–] pathief@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Serious question: how can YouTube pay the bills with zero ads? I'm not talking about making a profit, just breaking even.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)