this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
134 points (89.0% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
3332 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Generative AI Has a Visual Plagiarism Problem::Experiments with Midjourney and DALL-E 3 show a copyright minefield

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (5 children)

It is In no way illegal to generate copyrighted material. It is illegal to sell that material. You're more than free to draw or other wise create any pic of bart Simpson you want.

It's called fair use.

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There's a weird line here because I'm pretty sure the restriction is "commercial use" rather than outright selling. So even if they're including these AI products as "value-add" bundles or including them in i.e. Bing, they'd be tied the (ad, etc) revenue of the underlying product. There's also a difference between commercial entities and "personal use".

You might not be selling me a picture of Homer Simpson, but if you're providing it via a tool on a page with ads etc there's still a tie-in to a revenue stream and commercial activity

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Correct but if you're just generating the picture it's not illegal at all...which is exactly what this tool does.

load more comments (3 replies)