this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
1343 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

59495 readers
3081 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] exanime@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

It's expensive enough my employer (of more than 2000) decided to only trial it with a small subset of seniors. It's not just the license, it comes tied up with new hardware

So far nobody likes it. Most people use it to summarize meetings and we just got a memo saying we need to review the summaries because it keeps missing important data

Having said all that, when I mentioned the cost, I was referring to the cost of training the models. And without a proper business plan to monetize it, it's is still unclear how this version of AI could be actually sold for profit.

Remember that cost, is not just a number. It's the number in relationships with the benefit it provides.

For OpenAI, it has yet to produce profit that is not just venture capital and for us as user (us, I cannot speak for everyone) it has not saved us a dime after getting expensive hardware and licenses

Oh and for the final point. True, openAI may not have been the one to say no programmers in five years although, replacing people has always been their angle. But by now we have seen OpenAI play so fast and loose with all their claims and benchmarks, we cannot believe a word they say (which you seem to do and keep on posting here).

[–] Bongles@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago (5 children)

(which you seem to do and keep on posting here)

I've only made the comment you're replying to. I'm not whoever you're thinking.

[–] exanime@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Yes, my bad, apologies

I thought you were the person I replied to originally

[–] Bongles@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

All good. I think we're thinking of this from different aspects anyway. I'm thinking a company just subscribes as part of their office subscription and Microsoft is doing the heavy lifting of the cost and hardware. I don't know how OpenAI makes money besides their little subscription.

[–] exanime@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I don’t know how OpenAI makes money besides their little subscription.

As far as I have read, that's it, which is not profitable. They have been coasting on Venture Capital only so far.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)