Selfhosted

40329 readers

421 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz

554

Beware Hollywood’s digital demolition: it’s as if your favourite films and TV shows never existed (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 month ago by thirdBreakfast@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

127 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Last June, fans of Comedy Central – the long-running channel behind beloved programmes such as The Daily Show and South Park – received an unwelcome surprise. Paramount Global, Comedy Central’s parent company, unceremoniously purged the vast repository of video content on the channel’s website, which dated back to the late 1990s.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 43 points 1 month ago (6 children)

The only way to watch the original Star Wars movies before George completely fucked with them is piracy.

The 4K77, 80 and 83 editions are what you're after. Enjoy. There are apparently reduced noise versions as well, but I thought it was perfect as is. It's old. It's supposed to have noise and grain. The desert scenes in the first one are really noisy and I'm not 100% sure why. Maybe he filmed those on cheaper film stock in smaller cameras, but that's just a guess.

[–] janNatan@lemmy.ml 36 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The director was an amateur, and he didn't align the grains of sand with the grain of the film.

[–] kjaeselrek@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 month ago

It’s not his fault that sand is coarse, rough, and irritating, or that it gets everywhere.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They were course and rough and irritating and got everywhere.

load more comments (3 replies)