this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
1055 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
3024 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] VantaBrandon@lemmy.world 43 points 1 month ago (8 children)
[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 30 points 1 month ago (7 children)

That and executive ass covering, a way to avoid admitting to shareholders that they wasted their money on useless commercial real estate.

It's also shooting themselves in the foot. The first people to leave aren't going to be the clock punchers, it will be the best and brightest who can easily find other jobs.

[–] AAA@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

The first people to leave aren't going to be the clock punchers, it will be the best and brightest who can easily find other jobs.

Yes. But some of them are also the most expensive ones, so when they leave costs go down. And we all know "numbers must go up" (=cost must go down).

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So you're left with departments full of clock punchers who don't have vision or leadership. If you want to kill your Golden Goose, that's a good way to do it. The remaining departments full of drone followers aren't going to be making you the exciting groundbreaking products that make you money.

Of course then again I personally see value in employees, maybe business leadership does not or thinks they are all generic replaceable.

[–] AAA@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In my experience: the higher up the management chain, the higher the chance that they are just in for the bonuses - not for the company / industry. And those bonuses are always bound to these numbers which need to go up. When the numbers go down, these people are long gone.

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago

You nailed it. look at their more recent announcements about execs not taking bonuses--- they're giving up bonuses for the coming year. I expect most of them to 'pursue other interests' but they'll keep their bonuses, whatever team gets brought in to right the ship will then get screwed.

Might also be ass covering- with a pre-emptive promise of no bonuses it may be harder to replace them...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)