this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
1159 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3143 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Clearly, Google is serious about trying to oust ad blockers from its browser, or at least those extensions with fuller (V2) levels of functionality. One of the crucial twists with V3 is that it prevents the use of remotely hosted code – as a security measure – but this also means ad blockers can’t update their filter lists without going through Google’s review process. What does that mean? Way slower updates for said filters, which hampers the ability of the ad-blocking extension to keep up with the necessary changes to stay effective.

(This isn’t just about browsers, either, as the war on advert dodgers extends to YouTube, too, as we’ve seen in recent months).

At any rate, Google is playing with fire here somewhat – or Firefox, perhaps we should say – as this may be the shove some folks need to get them considering another of the best web browsers out there aside from Chrome. Mozilla, the maker of Firefox, has vowed to maintain support for V2 extensions, while introducing support for V3 alongside to give folks a choice (now there’s a radical idea).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 98 points 1 month ago (9 children)

There's no need to wait. Just switch to Firefox now. All the cool kids have already done it.

[–] sudo@lemmy.today 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The cool kids are switching to Librewolf because whatever is happening at Mozilla is increasingly concerning by the day.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Uh-huh. Which uses Mozilla's renderer. So, all those upstream commits in Libewolf's code base are coming from where, exactly?

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

bad changes aren't really happening in the renderer, are they?

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

No, but Librewolf and Iceweasel and all the other forks are ultimately wholly dependent on Mozilla and Firefox continuing to exist. If Mozilla techbros themselves into imploding entirely and goes bankrupt, for instance, all of those other fork projects are also by association toast.

load more comments (7 replies)