this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
1025 points (98.9% liked)

Greentext

4430 readers
908 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 57 points 1 month ago (28 children)

I don't think jewelry wearing is compatible with the Amish conception of propriety and modesty but I'm not going to say it wouldn't happen.

[–] bluewing@lemm.ee 36 points 1 month ago (8 children)

The "rules" the Amish live by are determined by the Elders of that group. They can be quite strict or fairly loose. And can vary by a fair bit from colony to colony even as neighbors. Cell phones can be fine for one group and be forbidden for the next.

Like some much in life, the rules are open to interpretation.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Right I get that, but the underlying value that the prohibitions are designed around is promoting humility and preventing vanity.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

But they're people. People can revisit and reconsider the values they live by. They can change things despite the tradition they were born into or even the tradition they helped establish. That allows the society to progress and survive changing conditions. Let's support it.

[–] medgremlin@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

If the jewelery was given as a gift in good will, it would be worse to reject it or to accept it and never use it.

[–] Baaahb@feddit.nl 2 points 1 month ago

That sounds like pride and pride sounds like sin!

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)