this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
50 points (75.0% liked)

Linux

48328 readers
626 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 41 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (12 children)

Because there's non-programmers in this community, if you aren't sure what this means but are too afraid to ask, it's a Regular Expression that better represents the terms "Linux" and "Unix."

Though if we're going to be that pedantic, it would be [nN][uiI][xX]$. That extra pipe wouldn't actually do anything in the last example, because regexp picks one character from the set by default.

And if we want to be really pedantic,

(?!nix)[nN][uI][xX]$

Would be the most accurate.

Edit: based on comments, I think...

(nux|NIX)$

...would be the best. Then you don't wind up with weird matches with things like UNiX.

[–] fhein@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Isn't (I|U) equivalent to ([IU])?

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 7 points 1 month ago

Yes, but you can really only do that with single characters, since your first example is an ordered group and the second is an unordered set in a capturing group. The equivalency drops off when you include more characters.

Plus, you can do things like [a-zA-Z], and you can't do that with the former example.

I would imagine there's a difference in computing overhead, too, but I have no idea which is more performant.

load more comments (10 replies)