this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
1433 points (96.8% liked)

Memes

45868 readers
1260 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 34 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Let's not vilify people asking for citations. With AI it's more important than ever to verify what you're reading.

[–] abbenm@lemmy.ml 73 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I'm absolutely okay with vilifying people asking for sources on the historical existence of snow.

[–] underisk@hexbear.net 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The historical existence of snow depends on where you’re talking about. Climate is changing but not every manifestation of that will cause less snow. It’s possible some places start getting more as rising temperatures create more moisture in the air in places that are historically cold and dry. For example, parts of the mountains here in Nevada had unusually high snowfall, like Lee’s Canyon While looking at (what appears to be) the historical data for the US overall doesn’t seem to show a significant deviation at a cursory glance.

Saying these things are obviously true while not bothering to check if they’re factually accurate is misrepresenting the problem and leaves openings for climate denialists to make themselves more credible. “You said snowfall was going down but it just saw record snowfall in the news!” Which is a bad argument but a convincing one to people who aren’t inclined to deal with a global apocalyptic problem.

[–] abbenm@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I'm talking about the fact that it ever happened, at all, anywhere. In this sense and in this spirit that I say "the historical existence of snow." It's not about a particular place or amount.

load more comments (4 replies)