How about we don't schedule critical meetings to start first thing Monday morning? Even if that's the "only" time everyone can meet? And if it's really the only time everyone has available, doesn't that warrant questioning a bit?

Or what if we just start later on Mondays? And maybe we consider not offsetting it but working later on other days? 39-hour week? 36-hour week?

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

You just hit the nail on the head for things that bother me. People just throwing out ideas that "only partially" work. This isn't just Monday's, or climate change, but literally every fucking bit of politics. It drives me up the wall.

"Yeah but it only makes things 50% better, so I don't support it"

So we'll sit with 100% bad rather than 50% better because Jim in Arizona thinks we need to only have perfect solutions, and that anything that only makes things better aren't worth investigating. Better transit, electric cars, heat pumps, hydrogen trains, gun control, sex education, free lunches? All horrible things to Jim because "they don't solve the problem". No, they just make it much better. Maybe we could use them while we search for the perfect solution, you know slow incremental change? No, okay then fuck you too, Jim

And while I clearly call out one side, us liberals are very guilty of this too. In fact, there's already an example of that elsewhere in these comments.

[–] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I hate to be that guy, but it is literally already too late to reverse climate change, largely due to the attitude of people like you.

Turns out incremental change is worthless when you are on a time limit.

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 5 points 1 month ago

Temporary incremental solutions and total solutions are not mutually exclusive.

load more comments (1 replies)