this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
49 points (59.5% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
2936 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 17 points 1 month ago (7 children)

yep, people that loved walled gardens like twitter will absolutely love bluesky

[–] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 6 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I don't think I get what you mean when you say "Walled Garden" in this context. Can you elaborate?

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

walled garden

(Edit, For example..) Facebook control all aspects: you can only do what they want. Mastodon can be hosted and modified by anyone, it's freedom.

A closed platform, walled garden, (...) is a software system wherein the carrier or service provider has control over applications, content, and/or media, and restricts convenient access to non-approved applicants or content. This is in contrast to an open platform, wherein consumers generally have unrestricted access to applications and content. - wikipedia

[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What are you talking about? BlueSky has absolutely nothing to do with Facebook. It's a different company using the open AT Protocol.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)