this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
348 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3199 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/22828099

USB was supposed to rule them all but it's now a mess of standards sharing the same connector. Different speeds, voltage, charging protocols, alt modes, even the number of pins used is variable.... For those asking, the thing is available on Kickstarter

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 94 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children)

If only USB-IF would do their fucking job and create actual standardized names with standard features instead of shit like USB 3.2 Gen 2x2

[–] dan@upvote.au 42 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

like USB 3.2 Gen 2x2

Did you see that the newest version is called USB 4 2.0? lol

[–] snowfalldreamland@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That is very very explicitly just the name of technical the specification. Its a documents for people who design usb devices. The tech media failed us by reporting on it like they did.

The spec also explicitly tells us that we should refer to the usb cables/ports/devices as e.g. "USB4 40Gib" or "USB 3 20GiB". So in fact we have easy to understand names but only a few manufacturers actually print that on the boxes or cables.

[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It could have been USB 4 Spec 2.0, couldn't it?

[–] snowfalldreamland@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

That's a really good idea! So good in fact that that is actually what they did call it! https://www.usb.org/document-library/usb4r-specification-v20

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)