I don't like the clickbait title at all -- Mastodon's clearly going to survive, at least for the forseeable future, and it wouldn't surprise me if it outlives Xitter.

Still, Mastodon is struggling; most of the people who checkd it out in the November 2022 surge (or the smaller June 2023 surge) didn't stick around, and numbers have been steadily declining for the last year. The author makes some good points, and some of the comments are excellent.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Non-file based computing is a highly unexplored design space.

No it isn't; that's what databases are.

[–] nanook@friendica.eskimo.com 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

@grue @ArchRecord An example of a database that doesn't keep it's data in files?

[–] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm not a big expert on database technology, but I am aware of there being at least a few database systems ("In-Memory") that use the RAM of the computer for transient storage, and since RAM doesn't use files as a concept in the same way, the data stored there isn't exactly inside a "file," so to speak.

That said, they are absolutely dwarfed by the majority of databases, which use some kind of file as a means to store the database, or the contents within it.

Obviously, that's not to say using files is bad in any way, but the possibilities for how database software could have developed, had we not used files as a core computing concept during their inception, are now closed off. We simply don't know what databases could have looked like, because of "lock-in."

[–] 0xD@infosec.pub 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Memory is still structured like a file and referenced over addresses, we just call it something else.

load more comments (2 replies)