Technology

59589 readers

2838 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

188

The War on Passwords Is One Step Closer to Being Over (www.wired.com)

submitted 1 month ago by GreenEngineering3475@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

130 comments fedilink hide all child comments

“Passkeys,” the secure authentication mechanism built to replace passwords, are getting more portable and easier for organizations to implement thanks to new initiatives the FIDO Alliance announced on Monday.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] nevemsenki@lemmy.world 131 points 1 month ago (19 children)

If the passkeys aren't managed by your devices fully offline then you're just deeper into being hostage to a corporation.

[–] unskilled5117@feddit.org 35 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (8 children)

The lock-in effect of passkeys is something that this protocol aims to solve though. The “only managed by your device” is what keeps us locked in, if there is no solution to export and import it on another device.

The protocol aims to make it easy to import and export passkeys so you can switch to a different provider. This way you won’t be stuck if you create passkeys e.g. on an Apple device and want to switch to e.g. Bitwarden or an offline password manager like KeyPassXC

The specifications are significant for a few reasons. CXP was created for passkeys and is meant to address a longstanding criticism that passkeys could contribute to user lock-in by making it prohibitively difficult for people to move between operating system vendors and types of devices. […] CXP aims to standardize the technical process for securely transferring them between platforms so users are free […].

[–] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And who forces all the corps to correctly implement that protocol? Getting you locked in is in all of their interests, after all.

[–] unskilled5117@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think it‘s fair to remain skeptical but the big organizations were part of the development, so there seems to be some interest. And it‘s not always in their interest to lock users in, when it also prevents users from switching to their platform.

Development of technical standards can often be a fraught bureaucratic process, but the creation of CXP seems to have been positive and collaborative. Researchers from the password managers 1Password, Bitwarden, Dashlane, NordPass, and Enpass all worked on CXP, as did those from the identity providers Okta as well as Apple, Google, Microsoft, Samsung, and SK Telecom.

load more comments (6 replies)

load more comments (16 replies)