this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
473 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
2936 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Discord defends itself against efforts to stop piracy on its platform by saying no to more invasive data collection. Even though Discord isn’t exactly known for privacy, this is a great move for its users. What are your thoughts?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stoly@lemmy.world 81 points 1 month ago (6 children)

The only thing that really sucks about it is that knowledge that was openly searchable is now locked away behind logins.

[–] example@reddthat.com 38 points 1 month ago (5 children)

no, you're also effectively locked out of any participation unless you provide an email address and phone number, which they won't even tell you about in advance but use dark patterns and gaslighting that they noticed "suspicious activity" to step by step first ask you for an email and then once that is validated they prompt you for a phone number. the only thing they don't do yet is ask for ID.

[–] subignition@fedia.io 18 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Validation level is set by server owners, you are unlikely to need to verify a phone number except in the biggest (and therefore spammiest) servers

[–] Lev_Astov@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I've never needed to add a phone number.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)