this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
68 points (94.7% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3168 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] markstos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (27 children)
[–] hsdkfr734r@feddit.nl 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (20 children)

I don't think so. Metadata is unencrypted (i.e. your contacts, who sends messages to whom and how often and when).
Messages itself are encrypted.

Am I wrong?

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org -3 points 1 month ago (8 children)

It uses signal Protocol so it has the same design defect for leaking meta data.

Both know who and when you are talking too. And thats really all the data the security apparatus cares about.

[–] hsdkfr734r@feddit.nl 1 points 1 month ago

I guess that's right. Although I'm (most likely) not a person of interest for any secret service. But the data could be interesting for marketing and insurance companies.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)