Why is it that it seems like Gnome seems to be implementing Windows bad practices? The last thing Linux needs is a Windows registry. One of the greatest benefits of Linux IMO is the ability to configure applications in config files... not having to use some custom tool to manage the configuration.
this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2024
60 points (98.4% liked)
Linux
48338 readers
730 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
This isn’t new. It’s been around since at least 2006 in the Gnome 2 days when everyone seemed to prefer Gnome
Dconf was a continuation of Gconf
Gconf was text though (well XML actually but not binary).
At least it's got a fairly well defined schema unlike the Windows registry which is really just a very big dumping ground with a completely unenforced schema. You can just browse it and the settings are all there, complete with value type, default value and sometimes even a description. And it's reactive too usually, so you change the setting and it applies immediately to running apps.
Tbh I'll take that over KDE's million config files spread out everywhere that are mostly undocumented and trashes your formatting and comments everytime it updates the file.
It's actually a pretty good implementation of a registry overall.
dconf is really good as it allows for admins to tweak the desktop experience.
It is closer to group policy although GP objects are just registry changes.
There also is xfconf on xfce4
Dconf is amazing. Lots of tweaks in a centralised place, searchable, with naming that makes sense, and documentation. It's standardised and it's legible.
It's not like the windows registry, in which stuff just gets dumped and isn't standardised at all.
Config files can be a mess. They're strewn around your system everywhere, aren't always named in a way that even lets you know they're a config file, you have to hunt them down individually, and syntax differs between them.
Saying it's like the windows registry seems kinda true from a surface level, but all the things that are actually wrong with the Windows registry aren't present in dconf.
Similar systems exist on other DEs, and this isn't a new thing, it's been around for a couple of decades.
Beginners won't agree with you. Imagine their reaction after hearing that they have to edit a config file written in an obscure script language they never heard of
and how is it simpler to tamper with a binary tree with different tools?
By having a GUI, even if it's a very bad one. It's all a matter of first impression
What's kinda neat is that I've seen NixOS users that will take the logfiles from dconf and use it to add into their configuration.nix and completely configure their DE on build.