this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
176 points (96.8% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54669 readers
417 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] what@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Until we live in a world where people have equal access to information and essential technology piracy is a moral imperative.

Should something which costs a few hours worth of work in the developed word cost three weeks worth of work in a less developed country, just to make a publishing company worth tens or hundreds of millions of dollars a few extra bucks? Of course not!

Every other argument is a moot point to me. If I hadn't pirated Photoshop and other software when I was a poor kid I wouldn't have the six figure career I have today. The ultrarich steal from us every day in more ways than I can count. Maybe when they start being held accountable I will start caring about their bottom line.

[–] crunchpaste@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Do we really need excuses for pirating media?

I pirate movies because I think digital access to them is overpriced, goes to the copyright holder instead of the creators, it's convenient and most importantly because I can.

I can't pirate going to the cinema, nor can I afford to build my own, therefore I gladly pay to have a seat and enjoy a movie there.

Edit: I thought this may be relevant to the movies example I gave. I don't think movie studios, giving nothing back to society after massive profits are the ones we should debate the morals of stealing with.

[–] Fapp@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 year ago

But all of those are excuses?

[–] Allan8795@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I'm amused at these statements these 'wannabe' pirates make to justify piracy. A smart person would pirate quietly without letting the world know or justifying it.

I know why I do it & I don't want some validation, internet points, 2 minutes of fame to sound / look cool.

[–] reddit_refugee@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You've just let the world know you're pirating though

[–] simin@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago
[–] lich_hegemon@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because for some piracy isn't simply about being a cheapskate but also about activism

[–] TommySalami@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Theres some truth to this, but a lot of people do use this as a shield against the general cultural acceptance that piracy is stealing or otherwise morally underhanded. I do it, but I don't have any illusion I'm one of the activists. I just get indignant and refuse to pay someone for content or entertainment who I think is damaging to the medium or predatory in general. I feel like if I really wanted to make a statement, I just wouldn't consume their work at all -- but life is short and I want to have my cake and eat it too.

[–] Cabrio@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's possible to do both, I consume plenty of pirated media simply because it's unavailable due to pathetic capitalist imposed digital distribution limitations and lack of equitable paid access.

I also consume other pirated media because I wouldn't spend my resources for access because I don't yet know the value of the content and won't pay just for an opportunity to be disappointed, been there enough times to have learned that lesson. I'm happy to spend my time to find out your media sucks, but not my money, because that's also my time with the addition that I've put actual effort into converting it into fungible assets.

I also deliberately pirate media that I would pay for and do understand the value of, both because I can't always afford to purchase said product from a company making billions of dollars in exploitative corporate profits and because I have no interest in caring about that over my own personal satisfaction in life.

[–] FactorSD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wouldn't it achieve more to boycott things instead? If you won't even give up watching a tv show, you aren't an activist you are just complaining on the internet.

[–] Cabrio@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Who said anything about a boycott? Do you just regurgitate shit you heard elsewhere without understanding the context of it?

[–] DrownedAxolotl@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

So true! Here, have some internet points and validation!

[–] quirzle@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t want some validation, internet points, 2 minutes of fame to sound / look cool.

No, you just need everyone to know you don't care about sounding/looking cool to sound/look cool. Totally different.

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Too cool to be cool syndrome.

[–] Hypnoctopus@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

You just said admitted to pirating, you little muppet.

[–] hyperhopper@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Especially when the statement makes no sense

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think this logic is silly.

Employers don't own you, so witholding wages for services you provided isn't stealing. Getting a haircut and not paying isn't stealing.

I think the better justification is: rights holders make it a pain in the arse to access content affordably, so fuck you, just going to steal it.

[–] mineapple@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

You're only partly right. You example services. Of course it is not possible to own services. Piracy is only applicable to products. The point of the Twitter guy is, that companies intentionally stop selling their software etc. as products to sell you the same thing as a service, so that you cannot own it.

[–] snor10@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Our current system of copyright is flawed and only serves the interests of corporations.

[–] Sentinian@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Can we not become subreddit by posting this shitty screenshots trying to justify our reasons? Just share your media and enjoy it.

[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

what do you mean trying to justify? discussion of shitty anti consumer tactics in digital media is perfectly valid

[–] Sentinian@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A screenshot of some comment is not really discussion though. This is a pretty base level understanding of the concept, which is why I say it's more cope then actual discussion.

[–] denemdenem@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is one of the most popular posts this week here with more than 4 HUNDRED comments. I don't know what you view as a discussion but I think this was a pretty successful attempt at creating one.

[–] Sentinian@lemmy.one -1 points 1 year ago

I will say this thread had way more discussion then I was expecting when I originally posted this. My point about the screenshot still stands, I would much prefer we discuss something new related to sharing media, instead of recycling the same discussion about why its justified to copyright infringe.

[–] solarzones@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Mango@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

That's my YouTube comment. You and so many others are making me feel like a badass. 😎

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Well paying for it is essentially leasing it, piracy is neither. So...

[–] LeHappStick@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here I am wondering why there is still a downvote button in the YouTube comments... it does nothing!

[–] Poob@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The same reason that a lot of crosswalks have fake buttons. So you feel like you have control.

[–] faladorable@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

and why elevators have non functioning close buttons

[–] Iridium@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Some elevators.

All the ones near me have fully functional close buttons.

[–] SirPutts_a_lot@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Child logic to justify behavior. Be better than this ya’ll.

[–] hyperhopper@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

While I appreciate the sentiment, theft of service is a crime. You don't have to be able to own something to be able to steal it.

[–] WigglingWalrus@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

How does that work though if you rent a car? You don't own it, but still stealing if you "steal" it.

[–] Wiggles@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

That's why I break into hotel rooms.

[–] BeeOneTwoThree@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If a service costs money, and you take that service for free without permission it is stealing. If I rent a car I don't own it. Is it not stealing to hijack a rental car for a few hours?

You can't have your cake and eat it too. You steal because it is easier or cheaper. Thats it.

If I rent a car I don’t own it. Is it not stealing to hijack a rental car for a few hours?

Not a great hypothetical. Copying files would mean that in your hypothetical... I see the red civic your rental service is providing... Look at it real hard, poof another one into existence and drive away in it.

Here's my example: I subscribed to Paramount Plus explicitly for Star Trek content. The week I subscribed, they pulled all of the non-Abrams films. So I got to watching other stuff. Eventually, they brought all of the films back. Cool, right?

So I finally get around to Prodigy, a show made for Paramount Plus. Two episodes in, and it vanishes. No announcements or warnings that that show was just going to disappear. It's gone. Because "it wasn't popular enough". A show that only existed on that one platform was pulled off of that platform with absolutely no other legal way to view it. Content that I specifically signed up for that platform to see, and now I can't... legally. Yo ho, yo ho, me hardies.

[–] Nougat@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

That's why I claim ownership of every hotel room I've ever stayed in and every car I've ever rented.