this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024
55 points (93.7% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
2936 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)
  • I admit I am a bit suspicious this could be an astroturfed smear campaign from Intel, AMD, and/or Nvidia, considering Qualcomm is basically going to steal marketshare from them
  • what the actual fuck is that headline font
[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Ooof, clicked for you second point and regret it.

[–] thequantumcog@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

This article seem speculative. Qualcomm did provide TDP info for Snapdragon X elite. They displayed two variants. One with 80 watt tdp which was 10% faster (according to them) than M2 Max and 23 watt variant which was a little faster than M3.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 3 points 6 months ago

The Accusation: Skewed Benchmarks for Inflated Performance?

Oh no! Say it's not so. /s

We all know not to trust benchmarks from the manufacturer. We know this because we've all been burned by cherry picked results under favourable conditions that can't be reproduced.