this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024
43 points (100.0% liked)

Games

16806 readers
1127 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 16 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I read the article, and still have no clue what "content abandonment losses" are. Did they basically predict FFVII part 2 to sell as well as part 1, and then it didn't?

Seems weird to call your forecasting error a "loss" if that's the case.

[–] shinratdr@lemmy.ca 10 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I think they cancelled a bunch of projects in development, and they are writing off the cost.

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 months ago

This is (very likely) it. Made up scenario because I don't know what's in their pipeline, but this would be like seeing FF7 Remake not meeting expectations while Palworld thrives, and deciding to can the FF8 reboot they'd already floated millions into and instead redirecting their entire workforce to adding guns to the their Minecraft knockoff Dragon Quest Builders.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 months ago

Oh, okay, so it was they who abandoned the content, not the users. That makes a lot more sense. Thanks!

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Considering the glowing reviews on part 2, I'm surprised there's any sort of "loss" here.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 months ago

There might be some Hollywood accounting here.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago

Yeah, I was trying to reconcile that too, which is why I asked. Seem like it was other projects that were fully canceled, not the biggest of the big.

[–] HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 months ago

Too busy advertising Foamstars 😔😔😔