Linkedin : memes

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 100 points 11 months ago (2 children)

AI = 0 □

[+] InputZero@lemmy.ml 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] Technus@lemmy.zip 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

(MC^2 + C√P)^2 wouldn't give you that result though, because you have to FOIL.

Instead you'd get M^(2) C^4 + 2MC^(3)√P + PC^2

And that's not even the correct formula. It's

E^2 = (mc^(2))^2 + (pc)^2

You can't just naively apply a square root unless one of the terms is vanishing (momentum for a stationary mass, giving E = mc^2, or rest mass for a massless particle, giving E = pc = hf).

The way to remember this is that it's equivalent to the Pythagorean theorem, A^2 + B^2 = C^(2).

So it in fact only makes sense if AI = 0.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

In my experience, when E=mc² is written, physicists generally mean relativistic mass, making the formula extract, whereas m_0 is used for rest mass, as seen in the expansion E = m_0c² + m_0v²/2 + O(v⁴)

[–] Technus@lemmy.zip 3 points 11 months ago

Where does that expansion come from? As far as I can tell, m0v^(2)/2 only gives you the kinetic energy of the object where v << c, in which case the difference between relativistic mass and rest mass is negligible?

And where does the O(v^4) term come from?

[–] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 months ago

This really seemed like a good simplification until you threw in that d'Alembert operator at the end

[+] velox_vulnus@lemmy.ml 53 points 11 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

[deleted]

[–] Norgur@fedia.io 50 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like some ~~bullshit artist~~ motivational speaker

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Probably an AI expert too

[–] Norgur@fedia.io 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And a Bitcoin Scholar

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 3 points 11 months ago

Bitcoiners are old-school, serious people. They highly dislike such bullshit as they have seen the entire "crypto" shitshow, and the AI bullshit is similar in many ways

[–] lol_idk@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 months ago (4 children)

WTF does Indian have to do with anything?

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] NorthWestWind@lemmy.world 46 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It also means AI = 0

[–] Achyu@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I've heard about an extended version of the equation:
E^2^ = m^2^c^4^ + p^2^c^2^
Or E = (m^2^c^4^ + p^2^c^2^)^1/2^

If so, AI = (m^2^c^4^ + p^2^c^2^)^1/2^ - mc^2^

I may have the capabilities to be a technology management consultant

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 43 points 11 months ago (2 children)

So math is like painting, you can just arbitrarily add a splash of color somewhere to change the mood..

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 40 points 11 months ago (2 children)

As I said in another thread where this was posted, that original post has the distinctive voice of ChatGPT. Could be another similar model, but I'd bet money that was written by an LLM.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 18 points 11 months ago (2 children)

How did it lose so much quality since it was posted just a week or two ago?

[–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The ways of compression artifacts are mysterious.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] lol_idk@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Deleted

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 11 months ago

yeah it reads exactly like something chatgpt would write

[–] toastal@lemmy.ml 38 points 11 months ago

LinkedIn is just another Microsoft-owned account you should just delete for your sanity

[–] RayJW@sh.itjust.works 31 points 11 months ago (1 children)

!linkedinlunatics@sh.itjust.works back at it again with some more AI bs.

[–] Lemonyoda@feddit.de 3 points 11 months ago

Ist there actually an upcomming alternative for Job profiles and stuff?

[–] AyuTsukasa@lemm.ee 27 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I love that's it's not "what are you on about?" it's just a general what

[–] Logh@lemmy.ml 32 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I always found the difference between general and special whativity fascinating.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] tactical_trans_karen@hexbear.net 24 points 11 months ago

Reading this is an actual cognitive hazard.

[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 20 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I want to know who this idiot is.

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 11 months ago

his name is Chatgpt

[–] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

I mean, the equation isn't wrong given that AI basically becomes a rounding error and can be safely ignored.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] maculata@aussie.zone 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I’d like to present the equation solution to all sandwich related crisiseseses: BLT+AI.

[–] Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Bacon, Lettuce, Tomato + Avocado, Ice cream?

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] wesley@yall.theatl.social 17 points 11 months ago

This reads like a post written by AI as well lol

[–] emerald@beehaw.org 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

AI+8k+5G

[–] Achyu@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

We need a = sign sonewhere, right?

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Nope, none of this is math.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] onlooker@lemmy.ml 11 points 11 months ago

I like how the OP's name was censored for their privacy, but not the name of the person responding. Also, what the hell are these people huffing?

[–] ultra@feddit.ro 11 points 11 months ago

they did the meth right

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

When the marketing guy tries to do a job meant for the engineering department.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Thanks for listening to my TedX talk, which I paid to present.

[–] Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 11 months ago

Honestly I had too many people insist that Tedx has any value

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] CPMSP@midwest.social 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ha! "Consultant / Technology Manager" -- pretty sure he's just working on the next buzzword buffet to justify his bloated comp package.

Oh well, gives me an excuse to link this Weird Al song that makes far more sense.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] nohaybanda@hexbear.net 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Critical support for struggling academics trying to grift some brainless tech bro billionaire out of his money

Oops my bad I mess read who’s the phd and who’s the sentient clipart

[–] berkeleyblue@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

He should have let an AI proofread this…

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

It really reads like it was written by AI. I’ve never been to linkedin, maybe everyone talks like that there but it really sounds like it was written by ChatGPT

[–] Hupf@feddit.de 4 points 11 months ago

Both terms are linked by a blockchain.

Memes

Rules: