this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Technology

59569 readers
3431 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
0
Hikers rescued after following non-existent trail on Google Maps (www.smh.com.au)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
2 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hikers rescued after following non-existent trail on Google Maps::It was unclear how the trail in British Columbia had appeared on Google Maps in the first place.

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] baatliwala@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I use Osmand for trails in the woods, it is decently accurate in my country and also has a ton of other features

[โ€“] _s10e@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm also a happy osmand+ user, but once i got lost in the middle of a field / bush. I'm sure there was a trail once, but not safe to follow. Said bush was not very dense, so we though multiple times: Ok, this could be the way. Or that path?