this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
399 points (98.8% liked)

Not The Onion

12358 readers
244 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DessertStorms@lemmy.blahaj.zone 88 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This makes my blood boil.

It'd be bad enough if it was just any random person, but being disabled myself, I know far too well how difficult, to practically impossible, it can be to find a place that isn't only suitable to live in, but where the landlords will even consider you in the first place instead of instantly putting your application in the reject pile because you or someone in your household is disabled (both of which result in a high rate of homelessness among disabled people).

There are so many different and equally distressing levels of heinous to this bullshit, from misogyny to ableism, to classism, to just plain old wilful ignorance and cruelty.

People like this civil servant should spend their time being eternally grateful to not be in such a position as this mother is, since they wouldn't survive a fucking hour in her shoes.

FUCK

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I'm so sorry. Landlords are absolute lowest of the low, bastards among bastards.

[–] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What do landlords have to do with this?

[–] HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Read the parent comment again, particularly the second paragraph

Oh yeah. My bad.

[–] Thrillhouse@lemmy.world 73 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Isn’t it funny how the public servant basically manifested the home for her because she probably has a great lawsuit now?

[–] icydefiance@lemm.ee 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sure, if she finds a lawyer who will work pro bono.

Even then, she and her son will be homeless for a long time before winning anything.

No, the minister basically said he'd manifest a house for her.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 48 points 4 months ago (2 children)

"There were a lot of links that were emailed to me about manifesting a house and using witchcraft … I think it was 17 links in total all about positive manifestations," she said.

[–] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I suspect this public servant is just a hapless idiot. It's obviously not the housing authority's policy to recommend witchcraft. This person probably had good intentions.

That doesn't make it "ok", nor make the system any less broken, it just explains what's happened.

As an aside, in Australia you can't evict a tenant if they have no where to go. There isn't a bailiff in Australia that would put this woman and her son on the street.

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

I wish America were that enpathetic. Here we actively scorn those sorts of people as "losers" who deserve it

[–] DrownedRats@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

17 seems like overkill. If it worked, surely 1 would be enough.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 months ago

Visualizing an opportunity is fine, but you better add in "recognizing" and "engaging with" to that list.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

Baba Yaga, hear my call!

[–] Summzashi@lemmy.one 5 points 4 months ago
[–] OozingPositron@feddit.cl 4 points 4 months ago