Selfhosted

40329 readers

419 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz

nut_webgui v0.3.1, Light-weight NUT web GUI (github.com)

submitted 4 months ago by SuperiorOne@lemmy.ml to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I want to share a self-hosted tool I developed. It's a NUT monitoring tool similar to webNUT but it has some additional features like:

UPS command support to remotely tell your UPS beeper to shut up.
Supports some uncommon and old devices like ARMv6, ARMv7 and RISC-V64.
It's actually light-weight, ~7MiB image size and very low memory footprint.

If anyone looking a tool like this, repo is available at https://github.com/SuperioOne/nut_webgui

top 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] rjc@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

How does this compare to Peanut ?

[–] SuperiorOne@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Biggest difference is being able to execute INSTCMD commands, at least that was the main reason why I developed my own tool. Another less important differences are: older ARM support and since it's written in Rust, it's much more efficient in terms of resource usage. TBH, being that efficient only makes sense for very low-power devices.

Besides that, I don't think you can go wrong with either project.

[–] rjc@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Thanks for the reply, sounds compelling. I'm running peanut currently and have been happy with it, but I might power out down and give this a spin. Low resource usage sounds like a nice selling point.

Thanks for your contribution!

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Looks great! I'll have to give it a try

[–] SuperiorOne@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

Thanks! I appreciate any kind of feedback.