this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2024
814 points (97.9% liked)

Fediverse

28490 readers
388 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Probably better to post in the github issue rather than replying here.

https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/4967

(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Absolutely braindead consideration by the devs. I'll be quitting Lemmy if/when this is pushed through. Unbelievably stupid.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 9 points 3 months ago (8 children)

Please be aware that votes are already public, they just aren't shown in the UI. Other apps than Lemmy show the votes.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IndianaJones@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 months ago (5 children)

I was of the assumption they were private. Please make them private then because I want no one looking at my votes

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Asidonhopo@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Baked in visibility of votes and blocking that only works one way makes Lemmy (and anything based on ActivityPub) less functional from an end user standpoint. Wish I knew a decent, somewhat popular alternative that implemented these features

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pichu0102@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Maybe a model where upvotes and downvotes can per instance be federated either publicly or aggregated? So an instance admin could choose to bundle together the vote totals and push them to other instances and it would just show the total number of votes on comments and posts by people on their server rather than the individuals. And if a federated server acts up and sends bad vote totals, the instance could be blocked for it as a trade off.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ninekeysdown@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (4 children)

I thought they were already???

Like how/why wouldn’t they be public? Even if the data isn’t readily accessible via a gui it’s gotta be somewhere so that federation works. Unless you’ve been thirsty in your main it shouldn’t be a problem?

Am I missing something?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] auzy@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Already had one person today mention my down votes .

It didn't validate their argument at all and without context it can be interpreted in any fashion to make it seem malicious

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 months ago

So, federated network advantages here: you can always modify your instance's hosting code to patch this out, at least for the users on your instance.

What you cannot do is prevent other federated instances from publishing the votes submitted to content on their instance. But if you're accessing that content through your local instance, they can modify the upvote button to pop up a dialog saying something like: "The instance that hosts this content has elected to make usernames visible for upvote/downvote. Would you still like to vote?"

Personally: In many ways I don't mind. I'm on the internet with my real name. I don't mind being accountable for my behaviour online. I might be a little more cautious about upvoting something controversial or NSFW, but largely it wouldn't change my behaviour.

[–] Beaver@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 months ago

I'm down for more transparency. Lets make them public!

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 3 months ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›